Which is correct: “non-provision” or “non-provision”
Verbal nouns have two spelling options with the particle “not”. In speech, as a rule, there are more variants of continuous spelling.
The noun “providing” is written together with the negative particle “not” according to the established rule:
if there is no opposition in the sentence, “not” is written together with the noun.
In this case, the particle turns into a prefix.
The noun “providing” with a negative particle or prefix “not” is used mainly in the official business style of speech.
Rule for separate writing
If there is a opposition, an objection, it seems possible to insert some word after the prefix
(“not provided” = “was not provided”), then the term is written separately.
The particle “not” is written separately with all verbs and short participles:
“You did not provide a certificate” - “The certificate was not provided by you.”
“They did not recognize the state” - “The state is not recognized by them.”
“He did not present a certificate” - “They did not present a certificate.”
“The goods were not delivered on time” - “The goods were not delivered on time.”
non-provision or failure to provide
In Russian there are both spellings, the application depends on the context.
Example sentences
For clarity, consider a few examples:
- Failure to provide documents upon request on time will result in sanctions and unwanted suspicion. It is necessary to quickly prepare them for tomorrow.
- The worst thing is the failure to provide evidence of the suspect’s innocence.
- Failure to provide all required documents will delay the assignment and payment of benefits.
- The reason for postponing the deadline for consideration of the application was the failure to provide all supporting documents.
- Failure to provide information about the change of residence of borrowers to the bank is a pressing issue that should be worked on.
In all of the above examples, the noun “failure” is used as a refusal.
The tax office has requested documents: is it possible to ignore the request?
Those who periodically have to respond to requests from tax authorities to provide documents about their counterparty know how voluminous information they sometimes request and how difficult it is to comply with instructions in an extremely short time frame, limited to 5 days.
IMPORTANT! If you received a request to provide documents on the counter during the period from March 1 to May 31, 2021, the deadline for their submission has been extended by 20 working days (letter of the Ministry of Finance of Russia dated April 15, 2020 No. 03-02-08/29938).
Due to non-working days declared by the President due to the spread of coronavirus infection, tax authorities suspended all tax audits. ConsultantPlus experts have prepared a ready-made solution with explanations of which inspections have been suspended and when they will be resumed. If you don't have access to the system, get a free trial online.
However, no matter how voluminous the request, the demands of the inspectors cannot be ignored. For failure to fulfill this obligation, the offender, as indicated in the requirements, faces liability in the form of a fine. Under what article and for what can a negligent taxpayer be fined during counter audits? The questions are very difficult. Let's figure it out.
Example sentences
Examples of using separate writing with opposition:
- In fact, it was not the provision of documents, but an offer to find them in the archive on our own.
- This is not a guarantee, but a simple deception of the buyer.
- Here we see not the provision of material assistance, but vice versa. This activity strongly resembles fraud.
- In this unpleasant situation, the citizen is not required to be provided with living space, but to be excluded from the queue for housing.
- Not the provision of a job, but another request from the employer to wait - that’s all that was in the received message. This news ruined plans and clouded thoughts.
From the above examples it is clear that the meaning of a noun with the particle “not” means the ability to give something to someone. However, due to certain circumstances this does not happen.
Right
Failure to provide - the continuous spelling of a noun with the negative particle “not” is regulated by the rule: nouns with the particle “not” are written together. In this case, nouns take on the opposite meaning. They can be replaced with a synonym: non-provision - concealment. Failure to submit certificates on time may delay the payment of benefits. Failure to submit a declaration may result in administrative penalties. Vera complained about the failure to provide vacation according to the approved schedule.
Not provision - separate writing is possible if there is a contrast (not provision, but withdrawal). It was not the provision, but the forced seizure of documents that resulted in penalties. Failure to submit a declaration, but reporting false data may result in a fine.
Total found: 26
Question No. 299621 |
How to correctly write together or not “Case of failure to provide (improper provision) of information about the Company”
Russian help desk response
Correct: in case of failure to provide information about the company (providing unreliable, incomplete information. ).
Question No. 296149 |
Is the expression “complaint about non-provision of information” correct or is it correct “complaint about non-provision of information”? Thank you for your reply.
Russian help desk response
Proper management: complaining about something. Therefore, it is correct: a complaint about failure to provide information.
Question No. 295709 |
Good afternoon Tell me, in the phrase “documents not provided by the Buyer,” the particle “not” is written separately, since this is a participial phrase with a dependent word? A colleague argues that it is necessary to write together, since “not provided” is an adjective.
Russian help desk response
This is a participle because there is a dependent word by buyer. The particle should not be written separately.
Question No. 276488 |
Good day! In case of non-presentation, non-provision, non-payment, etc. - the words are written together. Please explain why and what rule applies in this case. Thank you!
Russian help desk response
There is no reason to write separately. Such reasons may be: opposition, increased denial, etc.
Question No. 274834 |
Read more: Where can you get a mortgage without a down payment
Is the following subject line correct? If so, how should it be written? “On (failure) to provide documents” A letter stating that some organization did not provide us with documents.
Russian help desk response
Correct spelling: about failure to provide documents.
Question No. 273093 |
Is the word non-provision written together or separately? Particularly interested in non-provision of services. same question - misuse
Russian help desk response
Correctly combined spelling if there is no opposition in the sentence: non-provision of services, inappropriate use (compare with contrast: this is not the provision of services, but some kind of mess).
Question No. 271042 |
how to correctly write not providing or not providing. Explain, please.
Russian help desk response
Not written together with nouns, if there is no opposition (in case of failure to provide a service.). If there is a contrast (this is not the provision of a service, but...), it should be written separately.
Question No. 267342 |
Good afternoon Please tell me whether a comma is needed in the following sentence: “In case of failure to provide documents (?), the supplier has the right. ". What rule governs punctuation in this case? Thank you in advance.
Russian help desk response
Question No. 266388 |
Tell me how to spell the word non/provision and what part of speech it is?
Russian help desk response
Failure to provide is a noun.
Question No. 263610 |
Good evening! Please tell me whether to correctly write NON-PREPARED SERVICES or NOT PROVIDED SERVICES
Russian help desk response
If there are no dependent words, the combined spelling is correct: services not provided.
Question No. 262326 |
How to correctly write 1. period of non-provision of services 2. or period of non-provision of services
Russian help desk response
The period during which the service is not provided is the period of non-provision of the service.
Question No. 252075 |
Hello, please answer me the following question: How should the word non-provision be written correctly (jointly or separately and most importantly WHY, in a sentence? “In case of failure to provide this or that, a fine of one thousand rubles will be charged.” Thanks in advance.
Russian help desk response
Correct spelling. Not with a noun is written separately only if there is or is implied opposition.
Question No. 251372 |
Failure to provide services, not provided together? Thank you in advance.
Russian help desk response
Correctly combined spelling. But: services not provided in a timely manner.
Question No. 248166 |
Good afternoon Tell me, is the word “unprovided” here together or separately? filled the gap of medium-term and long-term financing not provided by banks
Russian help desk response
Read more: When to file a declaration after purchasing an apartment
Question No. 246612 |
Good afternoon! I am engaged in the preparation of contracts of an engineering nature. And every time lawyers correct me, correcting my words: non-receipt, non-registration, non-submission, they do not write separately, arguing that it is possible to insert a word between them. I am sure that I am right, I ask for an authoritative opinion :)
Russian help desk response
In the absence of opposition, the given nouns are usually written together.
non-provision or failure to provide
Which is correct: “non-provision” or “non-provision”?
According to the spelling norm of the Russian language, both options are correct. Let's look at in what case you need to write the first option, and in what case - the second.
Note that the word “failure to provide” is a noun.
In this case, we are guided by the following rule:
“With nouns, “not” is written together if the word can be replaced with a synonym without “not.”
Let’s replace the word “failure” with a synonym without “not”:
non-provision - deprivation, concealment
Note that in a sentence, under certain conditions, this word can be written separately.
We write “not providing” separately:
- if the sentence contains a contrast with the conjunction “a”.
For example: not provision, but deprivation (where “deprivation” is an opposition).
- if there is one of the following constructions before the noun: far from, not at all, not at all.
For example: this is not giving at all.
- and also if there is an adverb with “neither” before the noun.
For example: no provision.
Examples for reinforcement:
- This is not a guarantee, but fraud!
- I think this is a failure to provide assistance.
- Failure to provide housing on time will be considered in court.
Source of the article: https://russkiypro.ru/pravilnoe-pravopisanie-nepredostavlenie-ili-ne-predostavlenie/
Continuous spelling with the prefix non-
Continuous writing usually predominates. In the absence of opposition, a certain synonym is selected that can replace the necessary word
, such as: concealment, non-presentation.
“Failure to provide documents with objections within ten days is grounds for bringing the order into effect.”
“Failure to provide papers will affect the result.”
“Failure to provide information to the tax authorities is a violation of the law.”
A similar rule applies when using words with similar spellings:
“Failure to notify a change in the situation may have unpleasant consequences.”
“Failure to receive funds into the account for a certain period of time will serve as a reason for refusing further cooperation.”
“Failure to receive timely information will result in loss of capital.”
“Failure to make the next payment will lead to increased accrual of penalty interest.”
For the words “non-direction”, “non-receipt”, “non-exceeding”, “non-confirmation” the same rules apply.
Present or provide as correct...
Present or provide, which is correct? What is the difference?
When should you say PRESENT and when should you PROVIDE?
And what is the correct way to say: present information or provide information?
Now is the opportunity to turn to such an interesting linguistic phenomenon as paronyms. Paronyms are words with the same root, different in meaning, but similar in sound. They are well known to us: put on - put on, signature - signature, residential - housing, pay - pay, business trip - business trip, etc. Often they are not distinguished, which is why speech errors appear. Surely many have heard how they sometimes say incorrectly: put up your own painting; pay for travel; wear a warm jacket; I present the floor for the report. So, let's turn to the paronyms that interest us.
Rule for "failure to provide" (noun + not)
How to spell the word "failure"? Before answering this question, it is necessary to ask another, no less important question - which part of speech this lexical unit belongs to. “Failure to provide” is a combination of the negative particle “not” with a noun. According to the grammar reference book on the Russian language, the particle is not written together with nouns : enemy, adversity, weakness.
Examples
- For failure to provide documents, he faced a heavy fine.
- She was extremely indignant at the failure to provide premises for the next meeting of the club.
- Have you complained about not being given your well-deserved vacation?
Do you know..
Which option is correct? (according to last week’s statistics, only 49% answered correctly)
Did not like? – Write in the comments what is missing.
Due to popular demand, you can now: save all your results, receive points and participate in the overall ranking.
- 1. Igor Proskurenko 279
- 2. Sergey Naumov 258
- 3. Igor S 244
- 4. Daniil Vasiliev 215
- 5. aleqsandr sagrishvili 149
- 6. Mikhail Azrapkin 142
- 7. Ulyana Potapkina 136
- 8. Alexander S 124
- 9. Alsou Sakaeva 118
- 10. Der Pro 113
- 1. Kristina Volosocheva 19.120
- 2. Ekaterina 18,721
- 3. Yulia Bronnikova 18,580
- 4. Darth Vader 17,856
- 5. Alina Saibel 16,787
- 6. Maria Nikolaevna 15,775
- 7. Larisa Samodurova 15,735
- 8. Igor Proskurenko 15,483
- 9. Liza 15,165
- 10. TorkMen 14,876
The most active participants of the week:
- 1. Victoria Neumann – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
- 2. Bulat Sadykov – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
- 3. Daria Volkova – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
Three lucky people who passed at least 1 test:
- 1. Natalya Starostina – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
- 2. Nikolay Z – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
- 3. David Melnikov – bookstore gift card for 500 rubles.
The cards are electronic (code), they will be sent in the coming days via VKontakte message or email.
Source of the article: https://obrazovaka.ru/kak-pishetsya/nepredostavlenie.html